![]() Su'a Cravens, who may as well share a family with Deone Bucannon at this point given all the pre-draft comparisons, earned acclaim as a nice Round 2 value from virtually every grader. WashingtonĬomments: Scot McCloughan has a track record as solid as any GM in the league, so it's hardly surprising to see Washington on this list. But Mike Brown compensated in Round 2 by nabbing Pitt's Tyler Boyd, the receiver with the fourth-highest Playmaker Projection in this class. 24, their third first-round cornerback in five years. Some thought it was curious the Bengals passed up on a receiver to pick William Jackson at No. Chris Burke thought it was "downright stunning" that Andrew Billings and Christian Westerman were still available in Rounds 4 and 5, respectively. Cincinnati BengalsĬomments: The Bengals were the only organization outside of Jacksonville to earn an A+ from any grader. His Saturday haul - which included universally hailed sleepers such as Tavon Young, Chris Moore and Kenneth Dixon - could help rebuild a base of talent which has aged and become untenably expensive. Ozzie Newsome received a whopping six extra picks through compensatory selections and trade-downs, netting the Ravens plenty of help in the trenches and at the offensive skill positions. Though McShay didn't provide any grades for us to include, the rest of the graders echoed his sentiment. 9, but compensated through their work in the later rounds.Ĭomments: On ESPN's broadcast, Todd McShay called the Ravens' five-pick Round 4 bonanza the best fourth-round class he's ever seen from a single team. Farrar thought the Bears reached a bit for Floyd in trading up to pick No. Both Prisco and Iyer believed that Leonard Floyd and Jonathan Bullard could become foundational front seven players, while Day 3 safeties Deon Bush and DeAndre Houston-Carson could push for starting roles in the secondary. This draft may be seen as the turning point in that rebuild, as the Bears earned praise for a trenches-heavy class which included five defensive additions. ![]() Chicago BearsĬomments: When John Fox and Ryan Pace took over last year, arguably their top priority was overhauling a defense built for a static 4-3 Tampa-2 scheme to better align with Vic Fangio's hybrid 3-4 concepts. Iyer quibbled with the lack of offensive line help to aid a unit that finished 16th in adjusted line yards and 25th in adjusted sack rate, but the likes of Sheldon Day and Tyrone Holmes were universally seen as strong Day 3 values. Nabbing potential top-five talent Myles Jack in the second round earned universal acclaim, but graders really liked how much Jacksonville targeted its mediocre front seven. The GPA is slightly lower than the 3.86 mark they earned last year, but their range of grades is the exact same as it was in 2015. For the second consecutive year, Dave Caldwell and the Jaguars had the consensus top draft in the league. Jacksonville JaguarsĬomments: No, I did not just copy and paste this from last year's report. Per usual, we'll look at the five teams with the highest, lowest, and greatest deviation in their average GPA, while also examining the year-over-year averages for each grader. ![]() Chris Burke and Doug Farrar, Sports Illustrated.Rob Rang, ( AFC East, West, North, South, NFC East, West, North, South). ![]() At Sports Illustrated, Chris Burke again graded the AFC teams while Doug Farrar handled the NFC side, which leaves us with this panel: Everyone and their uncle has an opinion about their favorite team's draft class, but what did the media cognoscenti think about every team's weekend in Chicago? As we do every year, we have compiled snap reaction grades from several reputable draftniks for our review on which teams generated the best, worst, and most polarizing feedback following the draft. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |